Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

1 / 1

450

+2.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Sempron LE-1300

1 / 1

438

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

2003

Why buy it

✅+2.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Sempron LE-1300

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (438 vs 450).

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron LE-1300 better than Mobile Athlon 64 3000+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron LE-1300 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ pulls ahead with 2.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron LE-1300 still makes the most sense overall. Sempron LE-1300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron LE-1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron LE-1300

The Sempron LE-1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 438 points. Launch price was $12.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Sempron LE-1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ versus 2.3 GHz on the Sempron LE-1300 — a 14% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1300. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Sempron LE-1300 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Sempron LE-1300's 438 — a 2.7% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3000+	Sempron LE-1300
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K	512 kB
Process	—	65 nm
Architecture	Oakville (2003−2004)	Sparta (2007)
PassMark	450+3%	438

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3000+	Sempron LE-1300
Socket	754	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	400	—
Max RAM Capacity	2	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) / not specified (Sempron LE-1300). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ rivals Pentium M 735.