Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Turion 64 MT-28
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Turion 64 MT-28 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Turion 64 MT-28 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Turion 64 MT-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
2003Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Turion 64 MT-28
2005Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (445 vs 450).
Quick Answers
So, is Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ better than Turion 64 MT-28?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Turion 64 MT-28 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.
Turion 64 MT-28
The Turion 64 MT-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Turion 64 MT-28 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-28 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Turion 64 MT-28's 445 — a 1.1% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Turion 64 MT-28 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+25% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512 kB |
| Process | — | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Oakville (2003−2004) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 450+1% | 445 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Turion 64 MT-28 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) / not specified (Turion 64 MT-28). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Turion 64 MT-28 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Turion 64 MT-28
