Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Athlon Neo X2 L325
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Athlon Neo X2 L325
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is positioned at rank 321 and the Athlon Neo X2 L325 is on rank 1185, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Performance Per Dollar Athlon Neo X2 L325
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Athlon Neo X2 L325 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Athlon Neo X2 L325 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Athlon Neo X2 L325
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon Neo X2 L325
The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L325 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Athlon Neo X2 L325's 615 — a 1.1% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Athlon Neo X2 L325 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+60% | 1.5 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | — | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Congo (2009) |
| PassMark | 622+1% | 615 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 — the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon Neo X2 L325 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs 2 (Athlon Neo X2 L325). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) and AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo X2 L325).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Athlon Neo X2 L325 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | ASB1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+19900% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 4 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) / not specified (Athlon Neo X2 L325). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Athlon Neo X2 L325 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Athlon Neo X2 L325
