Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
VS
Celeron N2808

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Celeron N2808

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Celeron N2808

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.25 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is positioned at rank 321 and the Celeron N2808 is on rank 1192, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#309
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
472%
#310
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
465%
#311
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
427%
#312
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
425%
#313
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
421%
#315
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
406%
#316
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
390%
#317
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
389%
#318
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
379%
#321
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#336
Xeon E3-1505M v5
MSRP: $115|Avg: $115
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2808

#1180
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5103%
#1181
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5028%
#1182
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4616%
#1183
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4595%
#1184
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4553%
#1186
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4397%
#1187
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4216%
#1188
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4209%
#1189
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4096%
#1192
Celeron N2808
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
98%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
97%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
95%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
93%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
92%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
91%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
91%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
89%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
89%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
88%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
88%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N2808 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightMobile Athlon 64 3700+Celeron N2808
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ (2005) relies on older node technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightMobile Athlon 64 3700+Celeron N2808
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Celeron N2808

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron N2808

The Celeron N2808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.25 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron N2808 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N2808 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus 2.25 GHz on the Celeron N2808 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Celeron N2808 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Celeron N2808's 615 — a 1.1% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3700+Celeron N2808
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+7%
2.25 GHz
Base Clock
1.58 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K (per core)
Process
22 nm
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
622+1%
615
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N2808 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2808 — the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ supports 197% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron N2808 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs 4 (Celeron N2808) — the Celeron N2808 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3700+Celeron N2808
Socket
754
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
400+13233%
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
2
4 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs VT-x (Celeron N2808). The Celeron N2808 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2808 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3700+Celeron N2808
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile