Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Celeron E1200
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Celeron E1200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is positioned at rank 321 and the Celeron E1200 is on rank 952, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($98) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($98) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Celeron E1200
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron E1200
The Celeron E1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $40.
Processing Power
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron E1200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron E1200 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron E1200 — a 40% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Celeron E1200 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Celeron E1200's 665 — a 6.7% lead for the Celeron E1200.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+50% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (total) |
| Process | — | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Allendale (2006−2009) |
| PassMark | 622 | 665+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 210 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 380 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron E1200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1200 — the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron E1200 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs 2 (Celeron E1200). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) and G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1200).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+19900% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 8 GB+419430300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs No (Celeron E1200). Primary use case: Celeron E1200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735; Celeron E1200 rivals Pentium E2140.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Celeron E1200
