Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

1 Cores2 Thrd60 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 4 2.40

1 Cores1 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

2003

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 60W instead of 110W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 4 2.40

2004

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (325 vs 345).
    • Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 83.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 60W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 better than Pentium 4 2.40?
    Yes. Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium 4 2.40 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2004 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (1.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium 4 2.40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2004 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

    The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Pentium 4 2.40

    The Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pentium 4 2.40's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.40 — identical boost frequencies. The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.40 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 scores 345 against the Pentium 4 2.40's 325 — a 6% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 2.40Pentium 4 2.40
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 2
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.4 GHz
    2.4 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    1 MB+100%
    Process
    130 nm
    90 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Northwood (2002−2004)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    345+6%
    325
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 2.40Pentium 4 2.40
    Socket
    PGA478
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    400
    Max RAM Capacity
    4
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Mobile Pentium 4 2.40) / false (Pentium 4 2.40).

    FeatureMobile Pentium 4 2.40Pentium 4 2.40
    Integrated GPU
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    false