Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Pentium M 1.50

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Pentium M 1.50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Pentium M 1.50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (345 vs 375).
❌150% higher power demand at 60W vs 24W.

Pentium M 1.50

2003

Why buy it

✅+8.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 24W instead of 60W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 1.50 better than Mobile Pentium 4 2.40?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is ahead with 60% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.50 pulls ahead with 8.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.50 is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 1.50 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 1.50 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 8.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 1.50 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Pentium M 1.50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 1.50

The Pentium M 1.50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pentium M 1.50's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium M 1.50 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 1.50 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 scores 345 against the Pentium M 1.50's 375 — a 8.3% lead for the Pentium M 1.50. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Mobile Pentium 4 2.40	Pentium M 1.50
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+60%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Northwood (2002−2004)	Banias (2003)
PassMark	345	375+9%