
Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Athlon 64 2600+

Mobile Sempron 3300+

Athlon 64 2600+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Sempron 3300+ is positioned at rank 1148 and the Athlon 64 2600+ is on rank 1080, so the Athlon 64 2600+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Sempron 3300+
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2600+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Sempron 3300+ | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Roma (2005) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Sempron 3300+ | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Athlon 64 2600+

Mobile Sempron 3300+
The Mobile Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Roma (2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 745. Thermal design power (TDP): 128 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon 64 2600+
The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Athlon 64 2600+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron 3300+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Sempron 3300+. The Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses the Roma (2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Sempron 3300+ scores 376 against the Athlon 64 2600+'s 392 — a 4.2% lead for the Athlon 64 2600+.
| Feature | Mobile Sempron 3300+ | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+25% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 512 kB+300% |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | Roma (2005) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 376 | 392+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses the 745 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Mobile Sempron 3300+ | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 745 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















