Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Pentium M 1.50

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Mobile Sempron 3300+

1 Cores1 Thrd128 WWMax: 2 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Pentium M 1.50

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Pentium M 1.50 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Sempron 3300+
1 / 1
376
+0.3%
brand logoAthlon XP 1600+
brand logoAthlon XP 1900+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon 64 2000+
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 5655G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Pentium M 1.50
1 / 1
375
0.0%
brand logoPentium III 1266S
brand logoAtom 230
brand logoAtom N280
brand logoPentium 4 2.40
brand logoCore i5-12500
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoXeon w7-3545
brand logoXeon w9-3575X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Pentium M 1.50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Sempron 3300+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Pentium M 1.50
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Pentium M 1.50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Sempron 3300+

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌433.3% higher power demand at 128W vs 24W.

    Pentium M 1.50

    2003

    Why buy it

    • ✅Draws 24W instead of 128W, a 104W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (375 vs 376).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Mobile Sempron 3300+ better than Pentium M 1.50?
    Yes. Mobile Sempron 3300+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.3% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Mobile Sempron 3300+ has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 33.3% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Sempron 3300+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Mobile Sempron 3300+ still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Sempron 3300+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% higher PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Mobile Sempron 3300+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Pentium M 1.50 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Mobile Sempron 3300+

    The Mobile Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Roma (2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 745. Thermal design power (TDP): 128 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Pentium M 1.50

    The Pentium M 1.50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Pentium M 1.50 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron 3300+ versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium M 1.50 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Mobile Sempron 3300+. The Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses the Roma (2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Pentium M 1.50 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Sempron 3300+ scores 376 against the Pentium M 1.50's 375 — a 0.3% lead for the Mobile Sempron 3300+.

    FeatureMobile Sempron 3300+Pentium M 1.50
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz+33%
    1.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    —
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    128 kB
    1 MB+700%
    Process
    90 nm-31%
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Roma (2005)
    Banias (2003)
    PassMark
    376
    375
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses the 745 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 1.50 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Sempron 3300+Pentium M 1.50
    Socket
    745
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1