Core Solo T1300 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core Solo T1300

1 / 1

385

+2.4%

376

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Solo T1300 is positioned at rank 1240 and the Mobile Sempron 3300+ is on rank 1148, so the Mobile Sempron 3300+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1300

#1228

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

15946%

#1229

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

15712%

#1230

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

14424%

#1231

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

14359%

#1232

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

14227%

#1234

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

13739%

#1235

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

13174%

#1236

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

13152%

#1237

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

12799%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

100%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Sempron 3300+

#1136

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3902%

#1137

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3844%

#1138

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3529%

#1139

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3513%

#1140

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3481%

#1142

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3362%

#1143

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3223%

#1144

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3218%

#1145

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3132%

#1148

Mobile Sempron 3300+

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1149

Pentium N3540

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

100%

#1150

Core i7-3555LE

MSRP: $300|Avg: $280

99%

#1151

Core i3-2377M

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

98%

#1152

Core 2 Duo E8435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $74

98%

#1153

Celeron M 723

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

97%

#1154

Core i7-3517UE

MSRP: $330|Avg: $35

96%

#1155

Core M-5Y51

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

96%

#1156

Pentium N3530

MSRP: $161|Avg: $20

96%

#1157

Core i3-330E

MSRP: $177|Avg: $89

95%

#1159

Core i7-2640M

MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A

94%

#1160

Core M-5Y71

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

93%

#1162

Core i7-2620M

MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Mobile Sempron 3300+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Solo T1300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.4% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Core Solo T1300	Mobile Sempron 3300+
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Roma (2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Core Solo T1300	Mobile Sempron 3300+
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Solo T1300 Benchmark Check

Mobile Sempron 3300+ Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

Mobile Sempron 3300+

The Mobile Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Roma (2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 745. Thermal design power (TDP): 128 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron 3300+ — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Mobile Sempron 3300+. The Core Solo T1300 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses Roma (2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1300 scores 385 against the Mobile Sempron 3300+'s 376 — a 2.4% lead for the Core Solo T1300.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Mobile Sempron 3300+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.66 GHz	2 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB+1500%	128 kB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Roma (2005)
PassMark	385+2%	376

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses 745 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.