Core Solo T1300 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+

Core Solo T1300 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+ Performance Spectrum

Core Solo T1300

1 / 1

385

+2.4%

376

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1300 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1300 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1300

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 128W, a 126W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Mobile Sempron 3300+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Sempron 3300+

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Solo T1300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (376 vs 385).
❌6300% higher power demand at 128W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1300 better than Mobile Sempron 3300+?

Yes. Core Solo T1300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Solo T1300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1300 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $209 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Solo T1300 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

Mobile Sempron 3300+

The Mobile Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Roma (2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 745. Thermal design power (TDP): 128 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron 3300+ — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Mobile Sempron 3300+. The Core Solo T1300 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses Roma (2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1300 scores 385 against the Mobile Sempron 3300+'s 376 — a 2.4% lead for the Core Solo T1300.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Mobile Sempron 3300+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.66 GHz	2 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB+1500%	128 kB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Roma (2005)
PassMark	385+2%	376

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Sempron 3300+ uses 745 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.