Atom N475 vs Core Solo T1300

CPU

GPU

Atom N475

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010

Core Solo T1300

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.66 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Atom N475

1 / 2

405

+5.2%

385

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N475 is positioned at rank 193 and the Core Solo T1300 is on rank 1240, so the Atom N475 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N475

#179

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

362%

#180

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

357%

#181

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

328%

#182

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

326%

#183

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

323%

#185

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

312%

#186

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

299%

#187

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

299%

#188

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

291%

#192

Pentium Gold 4417U

MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A

100%

#193

Atom N475

MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1300

#1228

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

15946%

#1229

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

15712%

#1230

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

14424%

#1231

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

14359%

#1232

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

14227%

#1234

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

13739%

#1235

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

13174%

#1236

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

13152%

#1237

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

12799%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

100%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Atom N475 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core Solo T1300 in both compute-intensive tasks (5.1% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Atom N475	Core Solo T1300
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($75)	✅ More affordable ($10)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core Solo T1300 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $75), it costs 87% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 613% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Atom N475.

Insight	Atom N475	Core Solo T1300
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+613%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($75)	✅ More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Atom N475 Benchmark Check

Core Solo T1300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N475 and Core Solo T1300

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core Solo T1300's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Atom N475 (base: 1.83 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core Solo T1300 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Core Solo T1300's 385 — a 5.1% lead for the Atom N475. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom N475	Core Solo T1300
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz+10%	1.66 GHz
Base Clock	1.83 GHz+10%	1.66 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB+300%
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	405+5%	385

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Solo T1300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.