Core Solo T1300 vs Core Solo T1350

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1300 vs Core Solo T1350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1300 vs Core Solo T1350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1300

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (385 vs 405).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 2.0 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Core Solo T1350

2006

Why buy it

✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 1.8 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1350 better than Core Solo T1300?

Yes. Core Solo T1350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 5.2% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Solo T1350 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 12% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1350 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1350 comes in $9 cheaper on MSRP at $200 MSRP versus $209 MSRP, and it still gives you 5.2% higher PassMark. It is also 9.9% better value on MSRP (2.0 vs 1.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Solo T1300 vs Core Solo T1350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1300 and Core Solo T1350 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 versus 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1350 (base: 1.66 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). Both are built on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Core Solo T1300 scores 385 against the Core Solo T1350's 405 — a 5.1% lead for the Core Solo T1350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Core Solo T1350
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.66 GHz	1.86 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	1.86 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	385	405+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Core Solo T1350
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Solo T1300 was priced at $209, while the Core Solo T1350 came in at $200. On launch pricing ($209 vs $200), Core Solo T1350 was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Solo T1300 delivers 1.8 pts/$ vs 2.0 pts/$ for the Core Solo T1350 — making the Core Solo T1350 the 9.5% better value option.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Core Solo T1350
MSRP	$209	$200-4%
Performance per Dollar	1.8	2.0+11%
Release Date	2006	2006

Search Core Solo T1300 on Amazon

Search Core Solo T1350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.