Core Solo T1300 vs Sempron LE-1100

Core Solo T1300 vs Sempron LE-1100 Performance Spectrum

Core Solo T1300

1 / 1

385

+2.4%

376

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1300 vs Sempron LE-1100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1300 vs Sempron LE-1100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1300

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Sempron LE-1100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron LE-1100

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Solo T1300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (376 vs 385).
❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1300 better than Sempron LE-1100?

Yes. Core Solo T1300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Solo T1300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1300 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $209 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron LE-1100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core Solo T1300 vs Sempron LE-1100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

Sempron LE-1100

The Sempron LE-1100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1300 and Sempron LE-1100 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 versus 1.9 GHz on the Sempron LE-1100 — a 13.5% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1100. The Core Solo T1300 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron LE-1100 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1300 scores 385 against the Sempron LE-1100's 376 — a 2.4% lead for the Core Solo T1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Sempron LE-1100
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.66 GHz	1.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Sparta (2007)
PassMark	385+2%	376

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1100 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.