Core Solo T1300 vs Pentium 4 2.66

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1300 vs Pentium 4 2.66 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1300 vs Pentium 4 2.66: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1300

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($209 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 46.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 1.3 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 110W, a 108W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 4 2.66

2002

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Solo T1300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (378 vs 385).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 1.8 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
❌5400% higher power demand at 110W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1300 better than Pentium 4 2.66?

Yes. Core Solo T1300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Solo T1300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1300 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1300 comes in $91 cheaper on MSRP at $209 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 46.2% better value on MSRP (1.8 vs 1.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2002) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Solo T1300 vs Pentium 4 2.66 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium 4 2.66

The Pentium 4 2.66 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 378 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1300 and Pentium 4 2.66 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 versus 2.66 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.66 — a 46.3% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.66. The Core Solo T1300 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.66 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1300 scores 385 against the Pentium 4 2.66's 378 — a 1.8% lead for the Core Solo T1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Pentium 4 2.66
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.66 GHz	2.66 GHz+60%
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	385+2%	378

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Pentium 4 2.66
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Solo T1300 was priced at $209, while the Pentium 4 2.66 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($209 vs $300), Core Solo T1300 was $91 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Solo T1300 delivers 1.8 pts/$ vs 1.3 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 2.66 — making the Core Solo T1300 the 37.5% better value option.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP	$209-30%	$300
Performance per Dollar	1.8+38%	1.3
Release Date	2006	2002

Search Core Solo T1300 on Amazon

Search Pentium 4 2.66 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.