Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Pentium 4 2.26

Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Pentium 4 2.26 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Sempron SI-40

1 / 1

322

+9.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Pentium 4 2.26

1 / 1

295

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Pentium 4 2.26 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Pentium 4 2.26: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Sempron SI-40

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌365.5% higher power demand at 512W vs 110W.

Pentium 4 2.26

2002

Why buy it

✅Draws 110W instead of 512W, a 402W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Sempron SI-40 across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (295 vs 322).
❌Launch MSRP is still $241 MSRP, while Mobile Sempron SI-40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Sempron SI-40 better than Pentium 4 2.26?

Yes. Mobile Sempron SI-40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data, 9.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Sempron SI-40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.3% more average FPS across 20 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Sempron SI-40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 9.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Sempron SI-40 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Mobile Sempron SI-40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $241 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium 4 2.26 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2002 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (1.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Mobile Sempron SI-40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2002) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Pentium 4 2.26 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Sempron SI-40

The Mobile Sempron SI-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Sable (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 322 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium 4 2.26

The Pentium 4 2.26 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 295 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Pentium 4 2.26 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron SI-40 versus 2.26 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.26 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.26. The Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses the Sable (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.26 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Sempron SI-40 scores 322 against the Pentium 4 2.26's 295 — a 8.8% lead for the Mobile Sempron SI-40.

Feature	Mobile Sempron SI-40	Pentium 4 2.26
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.26 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Sable (2008−2009)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	322+9%	295

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 4 2.26 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.