Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40

Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 2.30

1 / 1

325

+0.9%

322

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2.30

2003

Why buy it

✅Draws 73W instead of 512W, a 439W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Mobile Sempron SI-40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Sempron SI-40

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (322 vs 325).
❌601.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 73W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 2.30 better than Mobile Sempron SI-40?

Yes. Celeron 2.30 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 2.30 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 15% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2.30 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 2.30 is the better buy right now. Celeron 2.30 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Mobile Sempron SI-40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2.30

The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Sempron SI-40

The Mobile Sempron SI-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Sable (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 322 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2.30 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron SI-40 — a 14% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.30. The Celeron 2.30 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses Sable (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.30 scores 325 against the Mobile Sempron SI-40's 322 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron 2.30.

Feature	Celeron 2.30	Mobile Sempron SI-40
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	128 kB	512 kB+300%
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	Northwood (2002−2004)	Sable (2008−2009)
PassMark	325	322

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2.30 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 2.30	Mobile Sempron SI-40
Socket	PGA478	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-400	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.30) / not specified (Mobile Sempron SI-40). Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.