
Celeron 2.30

Sempron 2800+
Celeron 2.30 vs Sempron 2800+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 2.30 vs Sempron 2800+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 2.30 vs Sempron 2800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 2.30
2003Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
- ❌17.7% higher power demand at 73W vs 62W.
Sempron 2800+
2001Why buy it
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($65 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($65 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 73W, a 11W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (320 vs 325).
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron 2.30 better than Sempron 2800+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 2.30 vs Sempron 2800+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2.30
The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 2800+
The Sempron 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $104.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 2.30 and Sempron 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 2800+ — a 14% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.30. The Celeron 2.30 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 2800+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.30 scores 325 against the Sempron 2800+'s 320 — a 1.6% lead for the Celeron 2.30. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 2.30 | Sempron 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz+15% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 256K+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Northwood (2002−2004) | Manila (2001−2006) |
| PassMark | 325+2% | 320 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 2.30 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 2800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.30 versus DDR-333 on the Sempron 2800+ — the Celeron 2.30 supports -220.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2.30 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Celeron 2.30 | Sempron 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | DDR-333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 2.30) vs None (Sempron 2800+). Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget, Sempron 2800+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Celeron 2.30 | Sempron 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | None |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 2.30 was priced at $100, while the Sempron 2800+ came in at $65. On launch pricing ($100 vs $65), Sempron 2800+ was $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.30 delivers 3.3 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Sempron 2800+ — making the Sempron 2800+ the 40.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 2.30 | Sempron 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $65-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | 4.9+48% |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2001 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















