Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2.30

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (325 vs 345).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌21.7% higher power demand at 73W vs 60W.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 60W instead of 73W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 better than Celeron 2.30?

Yes. Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 2.30 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2003 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2.30

The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 2.30 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 versus 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. Both are built on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture using a 130 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron 2.30 scores 325 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 345 — a 6% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 2.30	Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	128 kB	512 kB+300%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Northwood (2002−2004)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	325	345+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Celeron 2.30	Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-400	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.30) / not specified (Mobile Pentium 4 2.40). Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.