Celeron 2.30 vs Mobile Sempron SI-42
Celeron 2.30
Mobile Sempron SI-42
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.30 is positioned at rank 1092 and the Mobile Sempron SI-42 is on rank 1175, so the Celeron 2.30 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.30
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Sempron SI-42
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 2.30 | Mobile Sempron SI-42 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sable (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 2.30 | Mobile Sempron SI-42 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.30 and Mobile Sempron SI-42
Celeron 2.30
The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.
Mobile Sempron SI-42
The Mobile Sempron SI-42 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Sable (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 332 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 2.30 and Mobile Sempron SI-42 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 versus 2.1 GHz on the Mobile Sempron SI-42 — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.30. The Celeron 2.30 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Sempron SI-42 uses Sable (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.30 scores 325 against the Mobile Sempron SI-42's 332 — a 2.1% lead for the Mobile Sempron SI-42.
| Feature | Celeron 2.30 | Mobile Sempron SI-42 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz+10% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 512 kB+300% |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Northwood (2002−2004) | Sable (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 325 | 332+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 2.30 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Sempron SI-42 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 2.30 | Mobile Sempron SI-42 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | S1g2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.30) / not specified (Mobile Sempron SI-42). Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Celeron 2.30 | Mobile Sempron SI-42 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 2.30 and Mobile Sempron SI-42
