Mobility Radeon 4100 vs GeForce 9300 SE
Mobility Radeon 4100
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is positioned at rank 666 and the GeForce 9300 SE is on rank 668, so the Mobility Radeon 4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon 4100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9300 SE is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GeForce 9300 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon 4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon 4100.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon 4100 | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9300 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300 SE holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $49), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 396% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon 4100 | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+396%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon 4100 and GeForce 9300 SE
Mobility Radeon 4100
The Mobility Radeon 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.
GeForce 9300 SE
The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon 4100 scores 81 and the GeForce 9300 SE reaches 82 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce 9300 SE uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 384 (GeForce 9300 SE). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 SE).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 81 | 82+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+22% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300 SE) — the GeForce 9300 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300 SE). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.1 (10_0)+10% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs None (GeForce 9300 SE). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD (VP3). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9300 SE).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | PureVideo HD (VP3) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon 4100 draws 30W versus the GeForce 9300 SE's 33W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 350W (GeForce 9300 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 80.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-9% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 80-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7+8% | 2.5 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon 4100 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 9300 SE launched at $50 and now averages $10. The GeForce 9300 SE costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.7 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 8.2 (GeForce 9300 SE) — the GeForce 9300 SE offers 382.4% better value. The GeForce 9300 SE is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-2% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 8.2+382% |
| Codename | M98 | GM108 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #927 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon 4100 and GeForce 9300 SE
