CPU
GPU
MOBILITY RADEON 9600
Popular choices:
GeForce PCX 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is positioned at rank 713 and the GeForce PCX 5750 is on rank 366, so the GeForce PCX 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5750.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9600 and GeForce PCX 5750
MOBILITY RADEON 9600
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.
GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 scores 36 and the GeForce PCX 5750 reaches 35 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 36+3% | 35 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+67% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS+25% |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 40 | 60+50% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 960 KB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce PCX 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 9.0a |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 draws 50W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 125.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+250% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.4 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 offers 4.3% better value.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-67% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4+4% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Broadway | GF110 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #846 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON 9600 and GeForce PCX 5750
