MOBILITY RADEON 9600 vs RADEON X300SE

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9600

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

RADEON X300SE

2020Core: 1327 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
Similar parts
·······

MOBILITY RADEON 9600 vs RADEON X300SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9600 vs RADEON X300SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9600

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $11 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • Delivers 16% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON X300SE

2020

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X300SE is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 22.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $60 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON X300SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.6% in PassMark G3D (38 vs 36), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X300SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 9600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $11 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $60, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16% (0.7 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X300SE has the stronger long-term case.

MOBILITY RADEON 9600 vs RADEON X300SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9600

The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

AMD

RADEON X300SE

The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 scores 36 versus the RADEON X300SE's 38 — the RADEON X300SE leads by 5.6%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON X300SE uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 1,408 (RADEON X300SE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9600RADEON X300SE
G3D Mark Score
36
38+6%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
800
1408+76%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS+314%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
88+120%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9600RADEON X300SE
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X300SE carries 512 MB. RADEON X300SE gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 and 64-bit on the RADEON X300SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) — the RADEON X300SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9600RADEON X300SE
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 draws 50W versus the RADEON X300SE's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 350W (RADEON X300SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9600RADEON X300SE
TDP
50W-50%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
0.7+75%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 came in at $49, while the RADEON X300SE launched at $60. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9600 was 18.3% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) vs 0.6 (RADEON X300SE) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 offers 16.7% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X300SE (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9600RADEON X300SE
MSRP
$49-18%
$60
Performance per Dollar
0.7+17%
0.6
Codename
Broadway
Navi 14
Release
January 7 2010
May 28 2020
Ranking
#846
#336

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.