
GeForce FX 5900XT

MOBILITY RADEON 9600
GeForce FX 5900XT vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5900XT vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce FX 5900XT vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5900XT
2011Why buy it
- ✅+11.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌630% higher power demand at 365W vs 50W.
- ❌21700% longer card at 218mm vs 1mm.
MOBILITY RADEON 9600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 365W, a 315W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 218mm, a 217mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (36 vs 40).
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5900XT vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5900XT
The GeForce FX 5900XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points. Launch price was $699.

MOBILITY RADEON 9600
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5900XT scores 40 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9600's 36 — the GeForce FX 5900XT leads by 11.1%. The GeForce FX 5900XT is built on Rankine while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9600).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40+11% | 36 |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 ×2+28% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+11% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 ×2+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+1150% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5900XT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5900XT and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9600. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) — the GeForce FX 5900XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5900XT draws 365W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9600's 50W — a 151.8% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 218mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 365W | 50W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 218mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.7+600% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5900XT came in at $0, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5900XT was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5900XT) vs 0.7 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) — the GeForce FX 5900XT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5900XT (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.7 |
| Codename | GF110 | Broadway |
| Release | March 24 2011 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #555 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














