
GeForce FX 5700

MOBILITY RADEON 9600
GeForce FX 5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce FX 5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5700
2010Why buy it
- ✅+13.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌306.1% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌338% higher power demand at 219W vs 50W.
MOBILITY RADEON 9600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 256.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 219W, a 169W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (36 vs 41).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700
The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.

MOBILITY RADEON 9600
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9600's 36 — the GeForce FX 5700 leads by 13.9%. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9600).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 41+14% | 36 |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+25% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+50% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+1100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 carries 128 MB. GeForce FX 5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9600. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) — the GeForce FX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9600's 50W — a 125.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.7+250% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 came in at $199, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9600 was 75.4% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 0.7 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 offers 250% better value.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $49-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.7+250% |
| Codename | GF110 | Broadway |
| Release | December 7 2010 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #497 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














