Mobility Radeon HD 2600 vs Radeon HD 7350

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7350

2012Boost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 vs Radeon HD 7350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 vs Radeon HD 7350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7350

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $60 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 145.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (168 vs 165), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $60 cheaper on MSRP at $40 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 145.5% (4.1 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 2600 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 vs Radeon HD 7350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7350

The Radeon HD 7350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 scores 168 and the Radeon HD 7350 reaches 165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 7350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7350). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7350).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2600Radeon HD 7350
G3D Mark Score
168+2%
165
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800
1792+124%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+156%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
112+180%
L1 Cache
80 KB
448 KB+460%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2600Radeon HD 7350
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7350 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7350 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7350. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7350) — the Radeon HD 7350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2600Radeon HD 7350
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7350's 200W — a 120% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2600Radeon HD 7350
TDP
50W-75%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
3.4+325%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 7350 launched at $40. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7350 was 60% cheaper ($60 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) vs 4.1 (Radeon HD 7350) — the Radeon HD 7350 offers 141.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7350 (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2600Radeon HD 7350
MSRP
$100
$40-60%
Performance per Dollar
1.7
4.1+141%
Codename
Broadway
Tahiti
Release
January 7 2010
January 31 2012
Ranking
#846
#454

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.