Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs GeForce 8400M GT
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
Popular choices:
GeForce 8400M GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is positioned at rank 683 and the GeForce 8400M GT is on rank 682, so the GeForce 8400M GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3410
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8400M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 182.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+182.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and GeForce 8400M GT
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points.
GeForce 8400M GT
The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 scores 63 versus the GeForce 8400M GT's 67 — the GeForce 8400M GT leads by 6.3%. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce 8400M GT uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M GT). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 63 | 67+6% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+2% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+150% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400M GT has 256 MB. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GT) — the GeForce 8400M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8400M GT). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs No (GeForce 8400M GT). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8400M GT).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 draws 30W versus the GeForce 8400M GT's 33W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-9% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 8400M GT launched at $50 and now averages $30. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 2.2 (GeForce 8400M GT) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers 186.4% better value. The GeForce 8400M GT is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-2% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-67% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3+186% | 2.2 |
| Codename | M98 | GM108 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #927 | #854 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and GeForce 8400M GT
