Mobility Radeon HD 3410
RADEON E2400
Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs RADEON E2400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs RADEON E2400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs RADEON E2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
2009Why buy it
- ✅+21.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 147.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RADEON E2400
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (52 vs 63).
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌104.1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs RADEON E2400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points.
RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 scores 63 versus the RADEON E2400's 52 — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 leads by 21.2%. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is built on TeraScale while the RADEON E2400 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 384 (RADEON E2400). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 63+21% | 52 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 0.9085 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+67% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and 64-bit on the RADEON E2400. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 512 KB (RADEON E2400) — the RADEON E2400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 draws 30W versus the RADEON E2400's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 350W (RADEON E2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1+110% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 came in at $49, while the RADEON E2400 launched at $100. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 3410 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3410) vs 0.5 (RADEON E2400) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3410 offers 160% better value. The newer card here is RADEON E2400 (2017 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3410 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3+160% | 0.5 |
| Codename | M98 | Lexa |
| Release | January 9 2009 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #927 | #773 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and RADEON E2400
