Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs FirePro 3D V3800
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V3800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is positioned at rank 418 and the FirePro 3D V3800 is on rank 238, so the FirePro 3D V3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V3800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V3800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V3800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $20), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 69.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+69.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($12) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and FirePro 3D V3800
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.
FirePro 3D V3800
The FirePro 3D V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 scores 463 and the FirePro 3D V3800 reaches 472 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale while the FirePro 3D V3800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V3800). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3800).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 463 | 472+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 1.104 TFLOPS+25% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V3800 has 512 MB. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 11.2 (FirePro 3D V3800). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V3800). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3800).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 draws 30W versus the FirePro 3D V3800's 74W — a 84.6% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-59% | 74W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 64mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 15.4+141% | 6.4 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro 3D V3800 launched at $129 and now averages $12. The FirePro 3D V3800 costs 40% less ($8 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 39.3 (FirePro 3D V3800) — the FirePro 3D V3800 offers 70.1% better value. The FirePro 3D V3800 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-48% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $12-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1 | 39.3+70% |
| Codename | M98 | Juniper |
| Release | January 9 2009 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #927 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and FirePro 3D V3800
