Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon R5 M240
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 M240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is positioned at rank 418 and the Radeon R5 M240 is on rank 238, so the Radeon R5 M240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 M240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 46.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+46.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and Radeon R5 M240
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.
Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 scores 463 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 463 | 473+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+150% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+96% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+100% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M240 has 512 MB. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12+19% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 15.4 | 15.8+3% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon R5 M240 launched at $100 and now averages $30. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 15.8 (Radeon R5 M240) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers 46.2% better value. The Radeon R5 M240 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-33% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-33% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1+46% | 15.8 |
| Codename | M98 | Oland |
| Release | January 9 2009 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #927 | #911 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and Radeon R5 M240
