
Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Radeon R5 M240
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon R5 M240 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon R5 M240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 46.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R5 M240
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌49.3% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4670
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.

Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 scores 463 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 463 | 473+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+150% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+96% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+100% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M240 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12+19% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 15.4 | 15.8+3% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 came in at $67, while the Radeon R5 M240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4670 was 33% cheaper ($33 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 4.7 (Radeon R5 M240) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers 46.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M240 (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-33% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.9+47% | 4.7 |
| Codename | M98 | Oland |
| Release | January 9 2009 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #927 | #911 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














