Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Radeon R5 M320
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon R5 M320 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon R5 M320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon R5 M320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $83 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 118.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R5 M320
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌123.9% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon R5 M320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.
Radeon R5 M320
The Radeon R5 M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 475 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 scores 463 and the Radeon R5 M320 reaches 475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R5 M320 uses GCN, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M320).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M320 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 463 | 475+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1024+28% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M320 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M320 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M320.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M320 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 M320's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M320 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 15.4+144% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 came in at $67, while the Radeon R5 M320 launched at $150. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4670 was 55.3% cheaper ($83 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 3.2 (Radeon R5 M320) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 offers 115.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M320 (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | Radeon R5 M320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-55% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.9+116% | 3.2 |
| Codename | M98 | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 9 2009 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #927 | #522 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and Radeon R5 M320
