Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs FirePro V5700
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Popular choices:
FirePro V5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is positioned at rank 418 and the FirePro V5700 is on rank 368, so the FirePro V5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 4670.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and FirePro V5700
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.
FirePro V5700
The FirePro V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 scores 463 and the FirePro V5700 reaches 465 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale while the FirePro V5700 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 1,280 (FirePro V5700). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V5700).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 463 | 465 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1280+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 1.856 TFLOPS+111% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V5700 has 4 GB. The FirePro V5700 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 512 KB (FirePro V5700) — the FirePro V5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 10.1 (FirePro V5700). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs None (FirePro V5700). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro V5700).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 draws 30W versus the FirePro V5700's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 350W (FirePro V5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-80% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 15.4+397% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro V5700 launched at $599 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 23.3 (FirePro V5700) — the FirePro V5700 offers 0.9% better value. The FirePro V5700 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67-89% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1 | 23.3 |
| Codename | M98 | Cayman |
| Release | January 9 2009 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #927 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and FirePro V5700
