
Mobility Radeon HD 560v vs FirePro V3800

Mobility Radeon HD 560v
Popular choices:

FirePro V3800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is positioned at rank 633 and the FirePro V3800 is on rank 268, so the FirePro V3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 560v
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V3800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V3800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 560v.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V3800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V3800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $30), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 152.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+152.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($12) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 560v and FirePro V3800

Mobility Radeon HD 560v
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 318 points.

FirePro V3800
The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v scores 318 and the FirePro V3800 reaches 321 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro V3800 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 800 (FirePro V3800). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 318 | 321 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+1% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V3800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V3800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 11.2 (FirePro V3800). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v draws 50W versus the FirePro V3800's 74W — a 38.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 350W (FirePro V3800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-32% | 74W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4+49% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro V3800 launched at $129 and now averages $12. The FirePro V3800 costs 60% less ($18 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.6 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 26.8 (FirePro V3800) — the FirePro V3800 offers 152.8% better value.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $129-14% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $12-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | 26.8+153% |
| Codename | Broadway | Juniper |
| Release | January 7 2010 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #846 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












