Mobility Radeon HD 560v vs GeForce 240M GT
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
Popular choices:
GeForce 240M GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is positioned at rank 633 and the GeForce 240M GT is on rank 575, so the GeForce 240M GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 560v
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 240M GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 240M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Mobility Radeon HD 560v offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 240M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 240M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $30), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 503.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+503.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 560v and GeForce 240M GT
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 318 points.
GeForce 240M GT
The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v scores 318 and the GeForce 240M GT reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 240M GT uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 384 (GeForce 240M GT). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 318 | 320 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+24% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 240M GT has 512 MB. The Mobility Radeon HD 560v offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) — the GeForce 240M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v draws 50W versus the GeForce 240M GT's 33W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 350W (GeForce 240M GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 33W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4 | 9.7+52% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce 240M GT launched at $100 and now averages $5. The GeForce 240M GT costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.6 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) vs 64.0 (GeForce 240M GT) — the GeForce 240M GT offers 503.8% better value. The GeForce 240M GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 560v | GeForce 240M GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $100-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $5-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | 64.0+504% |
| Codename | Broadway | GM108 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #846 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 560v and GeForce 240M GT
