CPU
GPU
Mobility Radeon X1400
Popular choices:
GeForce FX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1400 is positioned at rank 704 and the GeForce FX 5700 is on rank 367, so the GeForce FX 5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce FX 5700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1400 | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 211.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1400 | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+211.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1400 and GeForce FX 5700
Mobility Radeon X1400
The Mobility Radeon X1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points.
GeForce FX 5700
The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X1400 scores 43 and the GeForce FX 5700 reaches 41 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1400 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce FX 5700 uses Rankine, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 480 (GeForce FX 5700). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 43+5% | 41 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Rankine |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+67% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS+60% |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 40 | 60+50% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 960 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1400 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB. The GeForce FX 5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) — the GeForce FX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (9_3) (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.1+40% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1400 draws 30W versus the GeForce FX 5700's 219W — a 151.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-86% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+600% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1400 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce FX 5700 launched at $199 and now averages $15. The GeForce FX 5700 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.9 (Mobility Radeon X1400) vs 2.7 (GeForce FX 5700) — the GeForce FX 5700 offers 200% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1400 | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-75% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 2.7+200% |
| Codename | M98 | GF110 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #927 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1400 and GeForce FX 5700
