CPU
GPU
Mobility Radeon X1600
Popular choices:
GeForce 8600M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is positioned at rank 650 and the GeForce 8600M GS is on rank 702, so the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8600M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X1600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8600M GS.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1600 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X1600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon X1600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 37.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1600 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+37.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1600 and GeForce 8600M GS
Mobility Radeon X1600
The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.
GeForce 8600M GS
The GeForce 8600M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 89 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X1600 scores 92 and the GeForce 8600M GS reaches 89 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 8600M GS uses G9x, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 224 (GeForce 8600M GS).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92+3% | 89 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | G9x |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+257% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 8600M GS). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.1 (10_0)+23% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs None (GeForce 8600M GS). Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo HD (VP2).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | None |
| Decoder | Avivo | PureVideo HD (VP2) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1600 draws 50W versus the GeForce 8600M GS's 150W — a 100% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 350W (GeForce 8600M GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.8+200% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1600 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 8600M GS launched at $100 and now averages $20. The Mobility Radeon X1600 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.1 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 4.5 (GeForce 8600M GS) — the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers 35.6% better value. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1+36% | 4.5 |
| Codename | Broadway | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | January 7 2010 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #846 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1600 and GeForce 8600M GS
