Mobility Radeon X2500 vs GeForce 9300M G
Mobility Radeon X2500
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is positioned at rank 668 and the GeForce 9300M G is on rank 594, so the GeForce 9300M G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X2500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X2500.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X2500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon X2500 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 92.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X2500 and GeForce 9300M G
Mobility Radeon X2500
The Mobility Radeon X2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.
GeForce 9300M G
The GeForce 9300M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X2500 scores 82 and the GeForce 9300M G reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 9300M G uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 384 (GeForce 9300M G). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M G).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82 | 85+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+166% | 0.4216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300M G) — the GeForce 9300M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300M G). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M G).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | No |
| Decoder | — | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X2500 draws 50W versus the GeForce 9300M G's 33W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 9300M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 350W (GeForce 9300M G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 33W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6 | 2.6+63% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X2500 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 9300M G launched at $30 and now averages $30. The Mobility Radeon X2500 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 2.8 (GeForce 9300M G) — the Mobility Radeon X2500 offers 96.4% better value. The GeForce 9300M G is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $30-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5+96% | 2.8 |
| Codename | Broadway | GM108 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #846 | #880 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X2500 and GeForce 9300M G
