Mobility Radeon X2500 vs GeForce RTX 3070
Mobility Radeon X2500
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is positioned at rank #668 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X2500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X2500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 26939% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X2500.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-26939%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+26939%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1927.9% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon X2500.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1927.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X2500 and GeForce RTX 3070
Mobility Radeon X2500
The Mobility Radeon X2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X2500 scores 82 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 26939%. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82 | 22,172+26939% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 5888+636% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+1713% |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 40 | 184+360% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 5.8 MB+7150% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X2500 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 8 GB+3100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12 Ultimate+33% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6+130% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | — | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X2500 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 125.9% difference. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6 | 100.8+6200% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X2500 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The Mobility Radeon X2500 costs 92.5% less ($185 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (Mobility Radeon X2500) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1916.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X2500 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-90% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-93% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 110.9+1916% |
| Codename | Broadway | GA104 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #846 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X2500 and GeForce RTX 3070
