Moore Threads MTT S30 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Moore Threads MTT S30
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Moore Threads MTT S30 is positioned at rank 118 and the GeForce GTX 260M SLI is on rank 343, so the Moore Threads MTT S30 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S30
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is significantly newer (2009 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 260M SLI likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S30 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S30.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S30 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 260M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S30 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Moore Threads MTT S30
The Moore Threads MTT S30 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 580 points.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 588 points.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S30 scores 580 and the GeForce GTX 260M SLI reaches 588 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S30 is built on MUSA while the GeForce GTX 260M SLI uses G9x, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 224 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 580 | 588+1% |
| Architecture | MUSA | G9x |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+1729% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen1 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI). Decoder: MUSA Gen1 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen1 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen1 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S30 draws 255W versus the GeForce GTX 260M SLI's 150W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 260M SLI). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 255W | 150W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.3 | 3.9+70% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Moore Threads MTT S30 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI
