Moore Threads MTT S30 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P

Moore Threads MTT S30

Core: 1800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

2020Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2105 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Moore Threads MTT S30 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Moore Threads MTT S30 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Moore Threads MTT S30

Why buy it

  • Costs $45 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 79.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

2020

Why buy it

  • Moore Threads MTT S30 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon R5 A6-8500P is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 81.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 A6-8500P is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (587 vs 580), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R5 A6-8500P is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 12nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 0. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Moore Threads MTT S30 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $45 cheaper on MSRP at $55 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 79.6% (10.5 vs 5.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Moore Threads MTT S30 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R5 A6-8500P has the stronger long-term case.

Moore Threads MTT S30 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Moore Threads MTT S30

The Moore Threads MTT S30 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 580 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 587 points. Launch price was $579.

Graphics Performance

The Moore Threads MTT S30 scores 580 and the Radeon R5 A6-8500P reaches 587 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S30 is built on MUSA while the Radeon R5 A6-8500P uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 3,840 (Radeon R5 A6-8500P). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-8500P).

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S30Radeon R5 A6-8500P
G3D Mark Score
580
587+1%
Architecture
MUSA
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4096+7%
3840
Compute (TFLOPS)
14.75 TFLOPS
16.17 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs
256+167%
96
TMUs
256+7%
240
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S30Radeon R5 A6-8500P
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S30 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-8500P.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S30Radeon R5 A6-8500P
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Moore Threads MTT S30 draws 255W versus the Radeon R5 A6-8500P's 250W — a 2% difference. The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-8500P). Power connectors: None vs None.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S30Radeon R5 A6-8500P
TDP
255W
250W-2%
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
2.3
2.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Moore Threads MTT S30 came in at $55, while the Radeon R5 A6-8500P launched at $100. On MSRP, Moore Threads MTT S30 was 45% cheaper ($45 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 5.9 (Radeon R5 A6-8500P) — the Moore Threads MTT S30 offers 78% better value.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S30Radeon R5 A6-8500P
MSRP
$55-45%
$100
Performance per Dollar
10.5+78%
5.9
Codename
Chunxiao
Navi 21
Release
sem dados
October 28 2020
Ranking
#635
#65

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.