CPU
GPU
Moore Threads MTT S30
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Moore Threads MTT S30 is positioned at rank 118 and the Radeon R7 M360 is on rank 234, so the Moore Threads MTT S30 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S30
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M360
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 M360 is significantly newer (2015 vs 0). The Radeon R7 M360 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S30 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S30.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S30 | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $55 for the Moore Threads MTT S30, it costs 45% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 84.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S30 | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+84.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S30 and Radeon R7 M360
Moore Threads MTT S30
The Moore Threads MTT S30 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 580 points.
Radeon R7 M360
The Radeon R7 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S30 scores 580 and the Radeon R7 M360 reaches 585 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S30 is built on MUSA while the Radeon R7 M360 uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 768 (Radeon R7 M360). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M360).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 580 | 585 |
| Architecture | MUSA | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+433% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS+814% | 1.613 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 256+1500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 256+433% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S30 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M360 has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M360 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M360) — the Moore Threads MTT S30 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen1 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M360). Decoder: MUSA Gen1 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M360).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen1 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen1 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S30 draws 255W versus the Radeon R7 M360's 80W — a 104.5% difference. The Radeon R7 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M360). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 255W | 80W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.3 | 7.3+217% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S30 launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the Radeon R7 M360 launched at $120 and now averages $30. The Radeon R7 M360 costs 45.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.5 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 19.5 (Radeon R7 M360) — the Radeon R7 M360 offers 85.7% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S30 | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-54% | $120 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | $30-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5 | 19.5+86% |
| Codename | Chunxiao | Tobago |
| Release | sem dados | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #635 | #576 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Moore Threads MTT S30 and Radeon R7 M360
