GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Moore Threads MTT S30
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Popular choices:
Moore Threads MTT S30
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is positioned at rank 343 and the Moore Threads MTT S30 is on rank 118, so the Moore Threads MTT S30 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S30
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is significantly newer (2009 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 260M SLI likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S30 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S30.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Moore Threads MTT S30 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) | MUSA (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 260M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Moore Threads MTT S30
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 588 points.
Moore Threads MTT S30
The Moore Threads MTT S30 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 580 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI scores 588 and the Moore Threads MTT S30 reaches 580 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is built on G9x while the Moore Threads MTT S30 uses MUSA, both on 55 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S30).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Moore Threads MTT S30 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 588+1% | 580 |
| Architecture | G9x | MUSA |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 4096+1729% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Moore Threads MTT S30 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Moore Threads MTT S30 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Moore Threads MTT S30 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs MUSA Gen1 (Moore Threads MTT S30). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs MUSA Gen1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs H.264,H.265 (Moore Threads MTT S30).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Moore Threads MTT S30 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | MUSA Gen1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | MUSA Gen1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI draws 150W versus the Moore Threads MTT S30's 255W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 250W (Moore Threads MTT S30). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Moore Threads MTT S30 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-41% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.9+70% | 2.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Moore Threads MTT S30
