Moore Threads MTT S30 vs Radeon R5 A240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Moore Threads MTT S30 vs Radeon R5 A240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Moore Threads MTT S30 vs Radeon R5 A240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Moore Threads MTT S30

Why buy it

✅Costs $45 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 83.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Radeon R5 A240 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Moore Threads MTT S30 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌750% higher power demand at 255W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 A240

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 255W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
81.8% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Moore Threads MTT S30 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (580 vs 576), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Moore Threads MTT S30 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Moore Threads MTT S30 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $45 cheaper on MSRP at $55 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 83.1% (10.5 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Moore Threads MTT S30 vs Radeon R5 A240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Moore Threads MTT S30

The Moore Threads MTT S30 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 580 points.

Radeon R5 A240

The Radeon R5 A240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Moore Threads MTT S30 scores 580 and the Radeon R5 A240 reaches 576 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S30 is built on MUSA while the Radeon R5 A240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 320 (Radeon R5 A240). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A240).

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S30	Radeon R5 A240
G3D Mark Score	580	576
Architecture	MUSA	GCN 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4096+1180%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	14.75 TFLOPS+3192%	0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs	256+3100%	8
TMUs	256+1180%	20
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S30	Radeon R5 A240
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S30 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A240. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 A240) — the Moore Threads MTT S30 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S30	Radeon R5 A240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Moore Threads MTT S30 draws 255W versus the Radeon R5 A240's 30W — a 157.9% difference. The Radeon R5 A240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A240). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S30	Radeon R5 A240
TDP	255W	30W-88%
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	2.3	19.2+735%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Moore Threads MTT S30 came in at $55, while the Radeon R5 A240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Moore Threads MTT S30 was 45% cheaper ($45 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (Moore Threads MTT S30) vs 5.8 (Radeon R5 A240) — the Moore Threads MTT S30 offers 81% better value.

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S30	Radeon R5 A240
MSRP	$55-45%	$100
Performance per Dollar	10.5+81%	5.8
Codename	Chunxiao	Oland
Release	sem dados	October 8 2013
Ranking	#635	#911

Search Moore Threads MTT S30 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 A240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.