Opteron 144 vs Celeron 430
Opteron 144
Celeron 430
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 144 is positioned at rank 944 and the Celeron 430 is on rank 1010, so the Opteron 144 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 144
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 430
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 144 | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($29) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 144 | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+179%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($29) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 144 and Celeron 430
Opteron 144
The Opteron 144 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $65.
Celeron 430
The Celeron 430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 144 and Celeron 430 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Opteron 144 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 430 — identical boost frequencies. The Opteron 144 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 430 uses Conroe-L (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 144 scores 465 against the Celeron 430's 448 — a 3.7% lead for the Opteron 144. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 144 | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Conroe-L (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 465+4% | 448 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 226 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 144 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 430 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Opteron 144 versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron 430 — the Celeron 430 supports -202% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Opteron 144 | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 940 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Opteron 144) vs No (Celeron 430). Primary use case: Opteron 144 targets Server Legacy, Celeron 430 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 430 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Opteron 144 | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | No |
| Target Use | Server Legacy | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Opteron 144 launched at $65 MSRP, while the Celeron 430 debuted at $49. At current prices ($29 vs $10), the Celeron 430 is $19 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 144 delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 430 — making the Celeron 430 the 94.6% better value option.
| Feature | Opteron 144 | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $65 | $49-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $29 | $10-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0 | 44.8+180% |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron 144 and Celeron 430
