Opteron 144 vs Celeron 900
Opteron 144
Celeron 900
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 144 is positioned at rank 944 and the Celeron 900 is on rank 1193, so the Opteron 144 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 144
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 900
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 144 | Celeron 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($29) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 144 | Celeron 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+505%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($29) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 144 and Celeron 900
Opteron 144
The Opteron 144 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $65.
Celeron 900
The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Opteron 144 is built on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Opteron 144 scores 465 against the Celeron 900's 485 — a 4.2% lead for the Celeron 900. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Opteron 144 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 900.
| Feature | Opteron 144 | Celeron 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | — |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process | 130 nm | 45 nm-65% |
| Architecture | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | — |
| PassMark | 465 | 485+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 220 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 229 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 144 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 900 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Opteron 144 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 900 — the Celeron 900 supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Opteron 144) vs 1 (Celeron 900). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Opteron 144 | Celeron 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 940 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Opteron 144) vs No (Celeron 900). Primary use case: Opteron 144 targets Server Legacy, Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Opteron 144 | Celeron 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | No |
| Target Use | Server Legacy | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Opteron 144 launched at $65 MSRP, while the Celeron 900 debuted at $86. At current prices ($29 vs $5), the Celeron 900 is $24 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 144 delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 97.0 pts/$ for the Celeron 900 — making the Celeron 900 the 143.3% better value option.
| Feature | Opteron 144 | Celeron 900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $65-24% | $86 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $29 | $5-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0 | 97.0+506% |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron 144 and Celeron 900
