Opteron 148
VS
Athlon II Neo K145

Opteron 148 vs Athlon II Neo K145

AMD

Opteron 148

1 Cores1 Thrd85 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 148 is positioned at rank 754 and the Athlon II Neo K145 is on rank 1048, so the Opteron 148 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 148

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
15170%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2864%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2545%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1966%
#435
Xeon Gold 6354
MSRP: $2878|Avg: $2898
100%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
99%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
99%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
99%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
98%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
98%
#441
EPYC 7F52
MSRP: $3100|Avg: $1826
97%
#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
97%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
96%
#754
Opteron 148
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#757
Xeon E3-1281 v3
MSRP: $555|Avg: $636
100%
#767
Xeon E3-1270L v4
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II Neo K145

#1035
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2596%
#1036
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2558%
#1037
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2349%
#1038
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2338%
#1039
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2317%
#1041
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2237%
#1042
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2145%
#1043
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2142%
#1044
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2084%
#1047
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
100%
#1048
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1049
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1050
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1051
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
98%
#1052
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
98%
#1053
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1055
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
96%
#1056
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
96%
#1057
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
95%
#1058
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
94%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
94%
#1060
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
94%
#1061
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1062
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Opteron 148 leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon II Neo K145 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightOpteron 148Athlon II Neo K145
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Nile (2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 148Athlon II Neo K145
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 148 and Athlon II Neo K145

AMD

Opteron 148

The Opteron 148 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 548 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Opteron 148 and Athlon II Neo K145 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 148 versus 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 — a 20% clock advantage for the Opteron 148. The Opteron 148 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon II Neo K145 uses Nile (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 148 scores 548 against the Athlon II Neo K145's 565 — a 3.1% lead for the Athlon II Neo K145.

FeatureOpteron 148Athlon II Neo K145
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+22%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
130 nm
45 nm-65%
Architecture
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Nile (2010)
PassMark
548
565+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 148 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II Neo K145 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 148Athlon II Neo K145
Socket
939
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0