Opteron 148 vs Pentium M 770

AMD

Opteron 148

1 Cores1 Thrd85 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium M 770

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.01 GHz2005

Opteron 148 vs Pentium M 770 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 148 vs Pentium M 770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 148 vs Pentium M 770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 148

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 214.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 27W.

    Pentium M 770

    2005

    Why buy it

    • Draws 27W instead of 85W, a 58W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (545 vs 548).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Opteron 148 better than Pentium M 770?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 148 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium M 770 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Opteron 148 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 21900% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 148 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Opteron 148 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron 148 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% higher PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Opteron 148 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Opteron 148 vs Pentium M 770 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Opteron 148

    The Opteron 148 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 548 points. Launch price was $800.

    Intel

    Pentium M 770

    The Pentium M 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.01 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Opteron 148 and Pentium M 770 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 148 versus 0.01 GHz on the Pentium M 770 — a 198.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 148 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Opteron 148 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 770 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 148 scores 548 against the Pentium M 770's 545 — a 0.5% lead for the Opteron 148. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureOpteron 148Pentium M 770
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz+21900%
    0.01 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.2 GHz+3%
    2.13 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    2 MB+100%
    Process
    130 nm
    90 nm-31%
    Architecture
    SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
    Dothan (2004−2005)
    PassMark
    548
    545
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Opteron 148 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 770 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureOpteron 148Pentium M 770
    Socket
    939
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1