Opteron 148
VS
Atom E3826

Opteron 148 vs Atom E3826

AMD

Opteron 148

1 Cores1 Thrd85 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Atom E3826

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 1.47 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 148 is positioned at rank 754 and the Atom E3826 is on rank 922, so the Opteron 148 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 148

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
15170%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2864%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2545%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1966%
#435
Xeon Gold 6354
MSRP: $2878|Avg: $2898
100%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
99%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
99%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
99%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
98%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
98%
#441
EPYC 7F52
MSRP: $3100|Avg: $1826
97%
#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
97%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
96%
#754
Opteron 148
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#757
Xeon E3-1281 v3
MSRP: $555|Avg: $636
100%
#767
Xeon E3-1270L v4
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3826

#910
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1615%
#911
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1591%
#912
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1461%
#913
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1454%
#914
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1441%
#916
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1391%
#917
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1334%
#918
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1332%
#919
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1296%
#922
Atom E3826
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#923
Athlon II N370
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
98%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom E3826 (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 148Atom E3826
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 148 (2005) relies on 130 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 148Atom E3826
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 148 and Atom E3826

AMD

Opteron 148

The Opteron 148 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 548 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Atom E3826

The Atom E3826 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Opteron 148 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom E3826 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom E3826 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 148 versus 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3826 — a 39.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 148. The Opteron 148 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom E3826 uses Bay Trail-I (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 148 scores 548 against the Atom E3826's 545 — a 0.5% lead for the Opteron 148. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureOpteron 148Atom E3826
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+50%
1.47 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
130 nm
22 nm-83%
Architecture
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Bay Trail-I (2013)
PassMark
548
545
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 148 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom E3826 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 148Atom E3826
Socket
939
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom E3826 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Opteron 148 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureOpteron 148Atom E3826
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)