Opteron 152 vs Athlon 64 3800+
Opteron 152
Athlon 64 3800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 152 is positioned at rank 700 and the Athlon 64 3800+ is on rank 1106, so the Opteron 152 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 152
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 152 | Athlon 64 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Venus (2004−2005) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Venice (2004−2005) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 152 | Athlon 64 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 152 and Athlon 64 3800+
Opteron 152
The Opteron 152 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Venus (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $800.
Athlon 64 3800+
The Athlon 64 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Venice (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 648 points. Launch price was $160.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 152 and Athlon 64 3800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Opteron 152 versus 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3800+ — a 8% clock advantage for the Opteron 152. The Opteron 152 uses the Venus (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 3800+ uses Venice (2004−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 152 scores 620 against the Athlon 64 3800+'s 648 — a 4.4% lead for the Athlon 64 3800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 152 | Athlon 64 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+8% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 90 nm-31% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Venus (2004−2005) | Venice (2004−2005) |
| PassMark | 620 | 648+5% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 939 socket with PCIe 2.0.
| Feature | Opteron 152 | Athlon 64 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron 152 and Athlon 64 3800+
