Opteron 152
VS
Core i5-13400F

Opteron 152 vs Core i5-13400F

AMD

Opteron 152

1 Cores1 Thrd104 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Opteron 152 is positioned at rank #700 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 152

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13408%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
97%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2532%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2249%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1738%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
99%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
99%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
99%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
98%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
98%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
98%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
98%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
97%
#700
Opteron 152
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#703
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#705
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
99%
#708
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F

#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
107%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
107%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
106%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
106%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
105%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
105%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
104%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
104%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
104%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
76%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
104%
#76
Ryzen 7 7700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
103%
#77
Ryzen 9 5900XT
MSRP: $349|Avg: $311
102%
#78
Core i5-12500
MSRP: $212|Avg: $140
101%
#79
Core i5-14600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $275
101%
#80
Ryzen 7 7700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $246
101%
#81
Core i5-13400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $180
100%
#82
Core i3-12100T
MSRP: $125|Avg: $90
100%
#83
Core i7-11700F
MSRP: $298|Avg: $150
100%
#84
Core i3-10105F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $65
99%
#85
Core i5-9400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
98%
#86
Core i7-12700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
98%
#87
Core i5-12490F
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#88
Ryzen 5 5600GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $150
97%
#89
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#90
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
97%
#91
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
96%
#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
96%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
94%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
94%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-13400F (2023) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 152Core i5-13400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Venus (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 152 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 152Core i5-13400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 152 and Core i5-13400F

AMD

Opteron 152

The Opteron 152 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Venus (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Opteron 152 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Opteron 152 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 55.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Opteron 152 uses the Venus (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 152 scores 620 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 190.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Opteron 152 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureOpteron 152Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
10 / 16+900%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
4.6 GHz+77%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+4%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process
90 nm
Intel 7 nm-92%
Architecture
Venus (2004−2005)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
620
25,029+3937%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 152 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 152Core i5-13400F
Socket
939
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 152) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureOpteron 152Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming