Opteron 152
VS
Athlon Neo X2 L325

Opteron 152 vs Athlon Neo X2 L325

AMD

Opteron 152

1 Cores1 Thrd104 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 152 is positioned at rank 700 and the Athlon Neo X2 L325 is on rank 1185, so the Opteron 152 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 152

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13408%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
97%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2532%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2249%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1738%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
99%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
99%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
99%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
98%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
98%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
98%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
98%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
97%
#700
Opteron 152
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#703
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#705
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
99%
#708
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon Neo X2 L325

#1173
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4771%
#1174
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4701%
#1175
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4315%
#1176
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4296%
#1177
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4257%
#1179
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4111%
#1180
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3941%
#1181
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3935%
#1182
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3829%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
100%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
98%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
98%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
95%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
92%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
92%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
91%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
89%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
87%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Opteron 152 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon Neo X2 L325 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightOpteron 152Athlon Neo X2 L325
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Venus (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 152Athlon Neo X2 L325
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 152 and Athlon Neo X2 L325

AMD

Opteron 152

The Opteron 152 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Venus (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Athlon Neo X2 L325

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Opteron 152 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L325 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Opteron 152 versus 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 152. The Opteron 152 uses the Venus (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 152 scores 620 against the Athlon Neo X2 L325's 615 — a 0.8% lead for the Opteron 152.

FeatureOpteron 152Athlon Neo X2 L325
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+73%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Venus (2004−2005)
Congo (2009)
PassMark
620
615
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 152 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 152Athlon Neo X2 L325
Socket
939
ASB1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0